| Author |
Message |
kaycee

Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Posts: 3607
Location: Limburg The Netherlands or at www.kaycee.nl
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 7:53 pm
| |
Just before the vacation I bought a point and shoot camera for use underwater.
I tried to get some nice pictures before we go on vacation and I tought oh boy oh boy what have I done because the noise and sharpness was very bad (extreme condition for a point and shoot cam)
During the vacation I played a lot with this camera and underwater it makes some nice pictures but no stock quality.
Some pictures I made outside the water are great and got even the WOW factor and on some point even better than my dslr (I have test it)
Yesterday I submit a couple of pictures for review and guess what SS accepted the pictures made by the point and shoot camera the batch was a combination of point and shoot and dslr pictures also accepted the dslr pictures.
Are there people out here who's going back to point and shoot or stay with the dslr?????.
I never thought the quality was this good for point and shoot cameras these days, after you know the weakness of the camera in my case low light.
Here one of them made with the point and shoot camera.
|
|
rinder99

Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39138
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:45 pm
| |
I've said a lot of times . It really doesn't matter once you understand the limitations of the equipment used. And when you do, A whole new world opens. Good for you.Just stay away from sports and nature.....LOL
|
|
davidcrehner

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 4839
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:52 pm
| |
| rinder99 wrote: | | I've said a lot of times . It really doesn't matter once you understand the limitations of the equipment used. And when you do, A whole new world opens. Good for you.Just stay away from sports and nature.....LOL |
And low light, handheld, children running, pets who won't stay still, moving vehicles, objects with low contrast, etc., etc., etc. :-)
|
|
cyd
Joined: 23 Sep 2005
Posts: 300
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 10:11 pm
| |
| rinder99 wrote: | | I've said a lot of times . It really doesn't matter once you understand the limitations of the equipment used. And when you do, A whole new world opens. Good for you.Just stay away from sports and nature.....LOL |
Amen. I can only hold a p&s these days and have sold all my other equipment. I went with the Canon G9. What a surprise! With IS in the camera I can shoot at lower ISO, and it's pretty darned good at capturing action with no lag if I set it to continuous shooting. Noise is a problem at higher ISOs, but not if I print the photos.
I no longer worry about getting mugged for the thousands of bucks of equipment I wander the streets with, and it's always nice and snug in my purse (even the small ones!) to capture shots I would have missed otherwise. The worst shot I've taken with my p&s, just because it was handy, is 10 times better than the best shot I didn't take with my full gear, which I left at home because it was too much to carry around and I didn't want to risk damage.
ETA: Forgot to mention what an incredible job it does with macro, and how nobody kicks me out of places because I look like a pro :-)
|
|
galstyan

Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 3207
Location: Yerevan,Armenia
|
Posted: Wed Dec 17, 2008 10:35 pm
| |
What camera you bought Karin ?
|
|
eppicphotos

Joined: 10 Dec 2006
Posts: 444
Location: BC, Canada www.eppicphotography.com
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 1:03 am
| |
I have a Sony A-350 and the Live View works just like a P&S so does that count?
Actually I do rather enjoy my G9 as well for it's versatility (and yes I'll second the wonderful macro capabilities).
I miss the 4/3 aspect I used to shoot when I used Olympus DSLR's, so I like the P&S for the 4/3 aspect. Still though, the G9 will never totally take the place of my DSLR.
|
|
kenny123

Joined: 13 Aug 2005
Posts: 6078
Location: Masterton,Wairarapa, New Zealand
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 2:38 am
| |
If you know your camera,and realize its limits,you can make some decent shots-these were made with a $99 (New Zealand) Sanyo VPC 650 6mp compact camera-hand-held,No IS/VR:
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
255.81 KB |
| Viewed: |
3099 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
29.51 KB |
| Viewed: |
3106 Time(s) |

|
|
|
kaycee

Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Posts: 3607
Location: Limburg The Netherlands or at www.kaycee.nl
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 4:15 am
| |
| galstyan wrote: | | What camera you bought Karin ? | I bought the Olympus 850SW, I bought this one specialy for underwater.Normaly I go for a Canon with point and shoot (ixus serie)
|
|
ryuji

Joined: 16 Dec 2008
Posts: 1065
Location: http://www.milkysshop.com/shasin/ 写真が売れました!
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:06 am
| |
| kenny123 wrote: | | If you know your camera,and realize its limits,you can make some decent shots-these were made with a $99 (New Zealand) Sanyo VPC 650 6mp compact camera-hand-held,No IS/VR: |
Amazing!
|
|
hilaryaq

Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Posts: 1267
Location: www.photosfordesigns.com
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 7:44 am
| |
Some compacts are now shooting RAW, that's saying something.. they even have cute little itty lenses for some of them.. :)
|
|
bichon

Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 11329
Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 8:04 am
| |
| eppicphotos wrote: | I have a Sony A-350 and the Live View works just like a P&S so does that count?
Actually I do rather enjoy my G9 as well for it's versatility (and yes I'll second the wonderful macro capabilities).
I miss the 4/3 aspect I used to shoot when I used Olympus DSLR's, so I like the P&S for the 4/3 aspect. Still though, the G9 will never totally take the place of my DSLR. |
i'd love to throw out my d90 and get a G9...
i'm sorry, i started to get serious(er) about photography ! lol
|
|
jerryj2

Joined: 26 Nov 2005
Posts: 1466
Location: Psalm 66:20 Blessed be God Who hath not turned away my prayer nor His mercy from me.
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 12:39 pm
| |
| bichon wrote: | | eppicphotos wrote: | I have a Sony A-350 and the Live View works just like a P&S so does that count?
Actually I do rather enjoy my G9 as well for it's versatility (and yes I'll second the wonderful macro capabilities).
I miss the 4/3 aspect I used to shoot when I used Olympus DSLR's, so I like the P&S for the 4/3 aspect. Still though, the G9 will never totally take the place of my DSLR. |
i'd love to throw out my d90 and get a G9...
i'm sorry, i started to get serious(er) about photography ! lol |
Lots about the G9. Anyone using a G10, and if so how does it stack up?
|
|
thesupe87
Joined: 07 Feb 2006
Posts: 859
Location: arenacreative.com
|
Posted: Thu Dec 18, 2008 8:47 pm
| |
I find the macro on my point and shoot to be incredible...that little Canon Powershot has paid for itself a hundred times over. Everything I've submitted prior to April 08 was shot on a point and shoot.
If you know how to post process and noise filter, they can definitely produce stock quality images. Sometimes you barely need to noise filter, if everything is exposed properly and you're shooting at ISO 100. The HP point and shoot I had was always noisy, though. No matter what I did with the thing. Grainy noise, too. Some brands have much more artifacting than others - it's just all about the sensor size.
|
|
hoplessbliss

Joined: 30 Nov 2008
Posts: 1
Location: Kenora
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:38 am
| |
I myself have an Olypmus Stylus 790 SW and bought it for the same reason....because it goes underwater. It is a great little p&s.
I AM limited to what I can do, so since I am getting more and more into photography I am buying a new DSLR. Right now I just use my point and shoot and then my grandfathers 20 yr old Rebel. My old reliable.
But I will always be loyal to my p&s. I love that it fits in my pocket and I can take it with me anywhere. I don't leave the house without it. It is always in my purse, and because it has shock absrob, I feel it's alittle safer. Of course I do have a case that it goes in first, but this thing is TOUGH!!!
My nephew loves to run aroud the house and take pictures with it and take it outside. And he loves to take it to the pool and use it. Its great, because he can be really rough with it, drop it, throw it in the pool, whatever...and it still works great!
|
|
bichon

Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 11329
Location: Canada
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2008 1:10 pm
| |
| thesupe87 wrote: | I find the macro on my point and shoot to be incredible...that little Canon Powershot has paid for itself a hundred times over. Everything I've submitted prior to April 08 was shot on a point and shoot.
If you know how to post process and noise filter, they can definitely produce stock quality images. Sometimes you barely need to noise filter, if everything is exposed properly and you're shooting at ISO 100. The HP point and shoot I had was always noisy, though. No matter what I did with the thing. Grainy noise, too. Some brands have much more artifacting than others - it's just all about the sensor size. |
they are getting better at the in-camera processing, i guess.
i had a canon s45...
noise was a big issue.. as you say.. you must get the lighting right.. that's the only caveat...
i had big problems with dynamic range.. hazing .. artifacts.. fringing.....
that's why i left point and shoots 4 years ago...
|
|
| |
|