| Author |
Message |
rodehi
Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Posts: 1924
Location: British Columbia Canada
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:28 pm
|  |
I just recently submitted some shots with the keywords"firemen"and"fireman" the keyword software removed one or the other stating they were redundant.But..if I search for firemen and fireman i get totally different results....Ron |
|
fncdigital
Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Posts: 2159
Location: If there are any questions, direct them to that brick wall over there.
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:30 pm
| |
but are your pictures within those results? |
|
rodehi
Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Posts: 1924
Location: British Columbia Canada
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 1:40 pm
| |
edit: that made no sense,basically what Im saying is.. if the keyword software defines fireman and firemen as meaning the same thing,(thus preventing you from using both words)then the search results should be the same and show photos with both fireman and firemen keywords attached......so in other words searching for firemen should also bring up photos with the keyword fireman and vice-versa....like I said not a big deal just pointing it out |
|
Dwight Smith
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 987
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:33 pm
| |
"flowering" and "flowers" has the same problem. |
|
Nir Levy
Joined: 16 Jan 2005
Posts: 282
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 2:43 am
| |
It is because the search will automaticly have both of the words as terms in the search if one of them is entered. This is meant to help you as a submitter so that you don't have to think of every possible way to say a word. |
|
fncdigital
Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Posts: 2159
Location: If there are any questions, direct them to that brick wall over there.
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 2:57 am
| |
he is saying its NOT functioning that way |
|
Nir Levy
Joined: 16 Jan 2005
Posts: 282
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:34 am
| |
| fncdigital wrote: | | he is saying its NOT functioning that way |
Oh. My bad. But right before I made that post I was playign with the search and it was doing that. Sorry. |
|
shutterstock
Joined: 22 Oct 2004
Posts: 1881
Location: New York, NY
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 11:22 am
| |
We're on it. |
|
Tim
Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 458
Location: UK
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 2:07 pm
| |
Offtopic.
You work on sundays?
You unlucky man... Still, it is reassuring that shutterstock is taken so seriously. I realise that it is in your interest [your business] to do so, but I'm sorry you are working today. |
|
| |
|
Log in
