| Author |
Message |
enjoylife25
Joined: 09 May 2006
Posts: 102
|
|
xtuv
Joined: 31 Aug 2006
Posts: 198
Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 6:37 am
|  |
or check it out on a decent site like Dpreview
Also dont forget the Fullframe D3 |
|
hhltdave5
Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 10878
Location: Our stock and food photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 7:20 am
| |
I'll have to make sure I check it out. |
|
jaanster
Joined: 02 Jun 2005
Posts: 156
Location: Estonia
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 7:21 am
| |
Why does it have to be so expensive in Europe?
Price (body only)
• US: $ 1799
• UK: £ 1299
• EU: € 1980
1980 EUR= 2679.93 USD
Like where's the sense in that? Well, I can only hope that D200's price tag will drop significally. |
|
debljames
Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 970
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:10 am
| |
I figured as much. I just bought my D200 8 months ago. I won't be upgrading anytime soon. |
|
jps
Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Posts: 6940
Location: Denmark
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:11 am
| |
Im tempted.
My old d 50 is beginning to sound like a russian panzer.
Full frame.. With the d3. Im not sure it will be an advantage. But everybody praises it.
Makes the wideangels wider and my macro shorter.
Or have I misunderstood something.
What happens to sharpness and details of fx macrophotos when they are spread over the double number of pixels? |
|
debljames
Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 970
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:15 am
| |
I thought I read somewhere that you have to have completely different lenses for a full frame sensor. Is that right or wrong? Anyone know? |
|
rbstevens
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 501
Location: rbstevens.com
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:21 am
| |
| debljames wrote: | | I thought I read somewhere that you have to have completely different lenses for a full frame sensor. Is that right or wrong? Anyone know? |
Generally yes (your 35mm film camera lenses are full frame and will work on the full frame D3), but I think I read the D3 will automatically make the 1.5 crop if you attach one of the DX lenses.
Last edited by rbstevens on Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:36 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
jps
Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Posts: 6940
Location: Denmark
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:27 am
| |
well, I hope not completely new. They would work wont they?
So its just recalculating everything by 1,5?
I guess thats the way it goes in the future. Some say we will end with full frame and 25 m pix.
Considering the development of earlier times larger film formats, i think digital sensors may move that way also.
Imagine an ajustable tip-over sensor to capture unlimited DOF! |
|
lilcrazyfuzzy
Joined: 29 Nov 2005
Posts: 9926
Location: Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 12:22 pm
| |
| jps wrote: | well, I hope not completely new. They would work wont they?
So its just recalculating everything by 1,5?
I guess thats the way it goes in the future. Some say we will end with full frame and 25 m pix.
Considering the development of earlier times larger film formats, i think digital sensors may move that way also.
Imagine an ajustable tip-over sensor to capture unlimited DOF! |
as rbstevens said, you can use DX lenses with the D3 |
|
lilcrazyfuzzy
Joined: 29 Nov 2005
Posts: 9926
Location: Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 12:23 pm
| |
| jaanster wrote: | Why does it have to be so expensive in Europe?
Price (body only)
• US: $ 1799
• UK: £ 1299
• EU: € 1980
1980 EUR= 2679.93 USD
Like where's the sense in that? Well, I can only hope that D200's price tag will drop significally. |
because...we are richer? hahahaha no just kidding
Really, no idea, but If I decide to buy it then i'll make the trip to NY and buy that and a lens ;) |
|
jps
Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Posts: 6940
Location: Denmark
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 1:51 pm
| |
Simply because the American market is important to hold. Then they dump them there and let the rich Europeans pay for the difference.
supply and demand... and holding market shares and reputation on a mainstream marked. |
|
bluesky
Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 1235
Location: Madrid, Spain
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 3:15 am
| |
| lilcrazyfuzzy wrote: | | If I decide to buy it then i'll make the trip to NY and buy that and a lens ;) |
Any chance you'll be going to NY before Lisbon? Can I put an order for a canon lens whilst you're there? you add your percentage, whatever, I'll still be paying less than over here... |
|
lilcrazyfuzzy
Joined: 29 Nov 2005
Posts: 9926
Location: Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
| |
| bluesky wrote: | | lilcrazyfuzzy wrote: | | If I decide to buy it then i'll make the trip to NY and buy that and a lens ;) |
Any chance you'll be going to NY before Lisbon? Can I put an order for a canon lens whilst you're there? you add your percentage, whatever, I'll still be paying less than over here... |
no way, no trip before lisbon ;) |
|
tomlutz
Joined: 10 Aug 2007
Posts: 9
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2007 12:06 pm
| |
| jps wrote: | Im tempted.
My old d 50 is beginning to sound like a russian panzer.
Full frame.. With the d3. Im not sure it will be an advantage. But everybody praises it.
Makes the wideangels wider and my macro shorter.
Or have I misunderstood something.
What happens to sharpness and details of fx macrophotos when they are spread over the double number of pixels? |
I think you are right, JPS, to be concerned about the FX design for nature photography (like your awesome butterflies!) Thomas Hogan talks a bit about the new cameras, pixel density and similar concerns here:
http://www.bythom.com/D3comments1.htm
I would be happy with the D300!! |
|
| |
|
Log in
